From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinard v. Palakovich

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 16, 2006
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-2804 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 16, 2006)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-2804.

November 16, 2006


ORDER


AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2006, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, and both sets of Petitioner's identical Objections thereto (Documents #25 and #26), IT IS ORDERED that:

Petitioner mailed one set of Objections addressed to the Clerk of Court with instructions to file, and mailed a second set addressed to me with correspondence informing that the set was a courtesy copy. The Clerk's Office inadvertently filed both sets.

1. Petitioner's Objections are OVERRULED.

2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

3. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED with prejudice.

4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

5. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case closed for all purposes.


Summaries of

Kinard v. Palakovich

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 16, 2006
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-2804 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 16, 2006)
Case details for

Kinard v. Palakovich

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE KINARD, Petitioner v. JOHN PALAKOVICH, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 16, 2006

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-2804 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 16, 2006)

Citing Cases

Harrell v. Cain

Moreover, the state and the Magistrate's Report suggest that Harrell's remaining unexhausted claims are…