From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinard v. Nunnery

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 4, 2006
Case No. 04-70542 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 4, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 04-70542.

December 4, 2006


HONORABLE AVERN COHN


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

This is a prisoner civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants have interfered with his legal mail. The case has been referred to a magistrate judge for pre-trial proceedings. Defendants Wolfenburger, Scott, Cook, Redmond, Walsh, Hovey, and Kennedy filed a motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) based primarily on the difficulties plaintiff's appointed counsel is having with plaintiff. The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation (MJRR) recommending that the motion be denied. Defendants object.

The Court agrees with the magistrate judge that dismissal for lack of prosecution is not warranted at this time. However, plaintiff is on notice that lack of cooperation and communication with appointed counsel may result in dismissal of his case.

Accordingly, the MJRR is ADOPTED. Defendants' motion is DENIED. The case continues before the magistrate judge.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kinard v. Nunnery

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Dec 4, 2006
Case No. 04-70542 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 4, 2006)
Case details for

Kinard v. Nunnery

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY KINARD, Plaintiff, v. LARRY NUNNERY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Dec 4, 2006

Citations

Case No. 04-70542 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 4, 2006)