From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinaman v. Kinaman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 30, 1951
278 App. Div. 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

January 30, 1951.

Present — Peck, P.J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ.


The proof does not warrant a decree of annulment. Interlocutory decree appealed from unanimously reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed. Settle order on notice containing findings of fact and conclusions of law.


Summaries of

Kinaman v. Kinaman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 30, 1951
278 App. Div. 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Kinaman v. Kinaman

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL B. KINAMAN, Respondent, v. DOROTHY S. KINAMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 30, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)