From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimraj v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 21, 2005
898 So. 2d 993 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 5D04-1737.

March 4, 2005. Rehearing Denied April 21, 2005.

Administrative Appeal from the Unemployment Appeals Commission.

Doris Kimraj, Gotha, pro se.

John D. Maher, Deputy General Counsel, Unemployment Appeals Commission, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Doris Kimraj appeals an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission denying her eligibility for benefits. Based on the limited record before us, we agree that Kimraj was properly disqualified from receiving benefits chargeable to Dillard's, her short-term, part-time employer. However, Kimraj was a full-time employee of the Merristar Hotel for thirteen years, until she was furloughed and applied for unemployment compensation benefits two days later. It appears that the Commission failed to determine her eligibility for benefits due to her separation of her employment at the Merristar Hotel.

Accordingly, we affirm the denial of benefits chargeable to Dillard's, but remand this matter for further consideration of Kimraj's eligibility for benefits based on her employment with the Merristar Hotel.

AFFIRMED IN PART and REMANDED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kimraj v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 21, 2005
898 So. 2d 993 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Kimraj v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n

Case Details

Full title:Doris KIMRAJ, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 21, 2005

Citations

898 So. 2d 993 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)