From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimmel v. Kimmel

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 25, 2008
302 F. App'x 518 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-60004.

Argued and Submitted October 23, 2008.

Filed November 25, 2008.

Maxwell Phoenix Keith, San Francisco, CA, for Appellant.

John G. Warner, Esquire, Corte Madera, CA, for Appellee.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Dunn, Markell, and Klein, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding. BAP No. NC-07-1152-DMKK.

Before: BRUNETTI, ARCHER, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

The Honorable Glenn L. Archer, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

William B. Rooz ("Rooz") appeals the judgment of the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel ("BAP") affirming the bankruptcy court's dismissal of Rooz's complaint following the grant of Roberta Kimmel's Rule 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158, and we affirm.

The Bankruptcy Panel, affirming the bankruptcy court, ruled that Rooz's claim under California's Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act was barred by the discharge injunction of 11 U.S.C. § 524(a)(3). We affirm for the reasons stated in the BAP's opinion filed November 8, 2007.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Kimmel v. Kimmel

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 25, 2008
302 F. App'x 518 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Kimmel v. Kimmel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Roberta KIMMEL, Debtor, William B. Rooz, Appellant, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 25, 2008

Citations

302 F. App'x 518 (9th Cir. 2008)