From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimbrough v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 21, 2012
Case No. 12-10294 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-10294

12-21-2012

ERIC KIMBROUGH, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


Hon. John Corbett O'Meara


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Before the court is Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, filed November 12, 2012. The standard for granting a motion for reconsideration is as follows:

Generally, and without restricting the court's discretion, the court will not grant motions for rehearing or reconsideration which merely present the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication. The movant shall not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been misled but also show that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case.
LR 7.1(h)(3). Having reviewed the papers, the court concludes that Plaintiff has not demonstrated a palpable defect. Plaintiff has not demonstrated good cause for an extension of the summons.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED.

John Corbett O'Meara

United States District Judge

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on this date, December 21, 2012, using the ECF system.

William Barkholz

Case Manager


Summaries of

Kimbrough v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 21, 2012
Case No. 12-10294 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Kimbrough v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ERIC KIMBROUGH, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 21, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-10294 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 21, 2012)