From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimbrough v. Figuaroa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2016
CASE NO. 5:16-CV-01399-ODW (SK) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2016)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:16-CV-01399-ODW (SK)

10-13-2016

COREY LAMAR KIMBROUGH, Petitioner, v. FRED FIGUAROA, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed, and the action dismissed without prejudice. DATED: October 13, 2016

Petitioner consented to U.S. Magistrate Jurisdiction for all proceedings in this case (ECF No. 2), and Respondent's consent is not required because Respondent has not been served. See Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1119-21 (9th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge may order entry of judgment in this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). --------

/s/_________

HON. STEVE KIM

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Kimbrough v. Figuaroa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 13, 2016
CASE NO. 5:16-CV-01399-ODW (SK) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2016)
Case details for

Kimbrough v. Figuaroa

Case Details

Full title:COREY LAMAR KIMBROUGH, Petitioner, v. FRED FIGUAROA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 13, 2016

Citations

CASE NO. 5:16-CV-01399-ODW (SK) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2016)