From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimble v. Lexus of New Orleans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 14, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-299-JWD-RLB (M.D. La. Aug. 14, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-299-JWD-RLB

08-14-2018

RAYMOND H. KIMBLE, III (#160060107) v. LEXUS OF NEW ORLEANS, ET AL.


OPINION

After independently reviewing the entire record, the Court sustains Plaintiff's objection regarding allegations of inadequate medical care as to Correct Health, Jefferson Parish Correctional Center and Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office (as to the complaints of inadequate medical care only) since these allegations were not considered in the Report and Recommendation. The Court refers this part of the case to the Magistrate Judge to consider these claims only. While the Magistrate Judge did not specifically address the potential liability of Lexus, the Court nonetheless overrules Plaintiff's objection since Lexus is not alleged to have been a state actor and is not a proper defendant in this Section 1983 case. To the extent that Plaintiff is alleging a state law breach of privacy claim against Lexus, the Court declines supplemental jurisdiction of this claim. As to all other allegations, Plaintiff's allegation is overruled for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation with which the Court agrees.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on August 14, 2018.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Kimble v. Lexus of New Orleans

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 14, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-299-JWD-RLB (M.D. La. Aug. 14, 2018)
Case details for

Kimble v. Lexus of New Orleans

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND H. KIMBLE, III (#160060107) v. LEXUS OF NEW ORLEANS, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Aug 14, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-299-JWD-RLB (M.D. La. Aug. 14, 2018)