From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimble v. Gray

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jun 1, 1993
313 Ark. 373 (Ark. 1993)

Opinion

92-1486

Opinion delivered June 1, 1993

APPEAL ERROR — NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED ONE DAY TOO EARLY, AND THEREFORE HAD NO EFFECT. — Where petitioner filed her notice of appeal one day too early, her notice of appeal had no effect under the terms of Ark. R. App. P. 4(c), and her appeal was correctly dismissed.

Petition for Review granted; dismissal of appeal affirmed.

Kimberly D. Burnette, Child Support Enforcement Unit, for petitioner.

Dale E. Adams, for respondent.


We granted Rhonda Kimble's petition for review of the court of appeals' per curiam granting dismissal of her appeal. Appellee, now respondent, Robert Gray, Sr., previously asked the court of appeals to determine that Kimble had failed to file a timely appeal. The court of appeals found Kimble had filed her notice of appeal one day too early, and under the terms of Rule 4(c) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court held Kimble's notice of appeal had no effect. The court of appeals' per curiam, Kimble v. Gray, Sr., 40 Ark. App. 196, 842 S.W.2d 473 (1992), succinctly sets out that court's authority and reasons for dismissing Kimble's appeal. Because we agree with the court of appeals' per curiam and ruling, we merely affirm its decision.


Summaries of

Kimble v. Gray

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jun 1, 1993
313 Ark. 373 (Ark. 1993)
Case details for

Kimble v. Gray

Case Details

Full title:Rhonda KIMBLE v. Robert GRAY, Sr

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 1, 1993

Citations

313 Ark. 373 (Ark. 1993)
853 S.W.2d 890

Citing Cases

Lawrence Bros. v. R.J. Jones Excavating

A notice of appeal filed prior to the disposition of a post-trial motion has no effect, and a new notice of…

IN RE AR. RULES OF CIVIL PROC

Paragraph (b)(2), based on Federal Rule 4(a)(4), is new. It provides that a notice of appeal filed before…