Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:15-CV-71
06-27-2016
(GROH)
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On this day, the above-styled matter came before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") [ECF No. 15] of United States Magistrate Judge Michael John Aloi. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Aloi recommends that this Court grant the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 12] because substantial evidence supported the Administrative Law Judge's denial of the Plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits. Magistrate Judge Aloi further recommends that the Court deny the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 9] and dismiss the instant civil action. For the following reasons, Magistrate Judge Aloi's R&R is hereby ADOPTED and this case is DISMISSED.
In reviewing an R&R, this Court is required, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, to conduct a de novo review of those portions of a magistrate judge's findings to which objection is made. However, the Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and of a party's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984); Webb v. Califano, 468 F. Supp. 825, 830-31 (E.D. Cal. 1979). In this case, Magistrate Judge Aloi issued his R&R on May 27, 2016. As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error.
Upon careful consideration of the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation and the remainder of the record in this case, this Court finds no clear error. The Court ORDERS that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 15] should be, and is, hereby ADOPTED. The Court further ORDERS that the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 12] is GRANTED and the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 9] is DENIED. This matter is hereby DISMISSED and is retired from this Court's active docket.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter a separate judgment order in favor of the Defendant.
The Clerk is further DIRECTED to transmit copies of this Order to all counsel of record herein.
DATED: June 27, 2016
/s/_________
GINA M. GROH
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE