Kimble v. Baca

Full title: DEWAYNE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. LEE BACA, ET AL., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Sep 25, 2009

CV 09-1265-DDP(RC) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2009)

Opinion

DEWAYNE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. LEE BACA, ET AL., Defendants. No. CV 09-1265-DDP(RC) United States District Court, C.D. California. September 25, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, and has made a de novo determination.

         IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; and (2) the amended complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) and due to plaintiff's failure to diligently prosecute.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation by the United States mail on the plaintiff.