From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Department of Taxation

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Jan 8, 1946
21 N.W.2d 441 (Wis. 1946)

Opinion

December 4, 1945 —

January 8, 1946.

APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane county: HERMAN W. SACHTJEN, Circuit Judge. Affirmed.

For the appellant there was a brief by the Attorney General and Harold H. Persons, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Persons.

For the respondent there was a brief by Lines, Spooner Quarles, attorneys, and Maxwell H. Herriott of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Herriott.


Taxation. This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane county, affirming an order and decision of the Wisconsin board of tax appeals made September 28, 1943, which in turn vacated an assessment of additional privilege dividend taxes and granted a refund of part of the privilege dividend taxes the corporation had paid. The judgment from which the plaintiff appeals was entered August 2, 1945.


This case is ruled by Briggs Stratton Corp v. Department of Taxation, ante, p. 160, 21 N.W.2d 441, two cases, which are decided herewith. While the facts are slightly different, the determinative questions are the same. For the reasons stated in the opinion in those cases, the judgment in this case must be affirmed.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Department of Taxation

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Jan 8, 1946
21 N.W.2d 441 (Wis. 1946)
Case details for

Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Department of Taxation

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, Respondent, vs. DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION…

Court:Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date published: Jan 8, 1946

Citations

21 N.W.2d 441 (Wis. 1946)
21 N.W.2d 441

Citing Cases

Pabst v. Department of Taxation

The trustees take the position that under the rule, mobilia sequuntur personam, the situs of this income is…

Cudahy v. Department of Taxation

In the instant case there was a stipulation of facts between the parties in which appeared the following…