From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kimbark v. Waldemar Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 18, 1916
111 N.E. 1089 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued January 4, 1916

Decided January 18, 1916

Charles Goldzier for appellant.

Evan Shelby for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, HOGAN and CARDOZO, JJ. Dissenting: SEABURY, J.


Summaries of

Kimbark v. Waldemar Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 18, 1916
111 N.E. 1089 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Kimbark v. Waldemar Company

Case Details

Full title:ELMER M. KIMBARK, Plaintiff, v . WALDEMAR COMPANY, et al., Defendants…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 18, 1916

Citations

111 N.E. 1089 (N.Y. 1916)
111 N.E. 1089