Opinion
January, 1928
Judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the grounds that the charge that defendant was required to exercise especial care was erroneous, and that the submission of the question of the permanency of the injuries was not warranted by the evidence. Van Kirk, P.J., Hinman, Whitmyer, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.