Opinion
April 20, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oshrin, J.)
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion since there is a question of fact as to whether they had constructive notice of the condition which allegedly caused the injured plaintiff to fall ( see, Salaam v. City of New York, 226 A.D.2d 173).
Rosenblatt, J.P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ. concur.