From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kim v. TD Bank U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 5, 2022
1:22-cv-06761-JGK (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 5, 2022)

Opinion

1:22-cv-06761-JGK

10-05-2022

HAK KIM, Plaintiff, v. TD BANK USA N.A., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:

It having been reported to this Court that the defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. has settled this action with the plaintiff, it is, on this Sth day of October, 2022, hereby ordered that this matter with respect to said defendant be discontinued with prejudice but without costs; provided, however, that within 45 days of the date of this order, counsel for the plaintiff may apply by letter for restoration of the action to the calendar of the undersigned, in which event the action will be restored.

Any application to reopen must be filed within forty-five (45) days of this order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same forty-five-day period to be so-ordered by the Court. Unless the Court

orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

All pending motions with respect to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. are dismissed as moot. All conferences pertaining to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. are canceled.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kim v. TD Bank U.S.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 5, 2022
1:22-cv-06761-JGK (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Kim v. TD Bank U.S.

Case Details

Full title:HAK KIM, Plaintiff, v. TD BANK USA N.A., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 5, 2022

Citations

1:22-cv-06761-JGK (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 5, 2022)