From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kim v. Staber

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Aug 30, 2010
Case No. 2:09-cv-667-FtM-29DNF (M.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-667-FtM-29DNF.

August 30, 2010


OPINION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant GEICO Casualty Company's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Sever Count I of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. #7). Plaintiff filed a response on November 5, 2009 (Doc. #12) acquiescing in the motion to dismiss Count I.

The Court agrees with the parties that there is no case or controversy as to GEICO relating to Count I. Therefore, Count I will be dismissed as to GEICO.

The Court also agrees with GEICO that defendant Polo R. Staber was fraudulently joined in Count I for the sole purpose of destroying diversity jurisdiction. Fraudulent joinder exists where a diverse defendant is joined with a non-diverse defendant as to whom there is no joint, several, or alternative liability and the claim against the diverse defendant has no real connection to the claim against the non-diverse defendant. Triggs v. John Crumpa Toyota, Inc., 154 F.3d 1284, 1287 (11th Cir. 1998) (citingTapscott v. MS Dealer Serv. Corp., 77 F.3d 1353, 1355 (11th Cir. 1996), abrogated on other grounds by Cohen v. Office Depot, Inc., 204 F.3d 1069 (11th Cir. 2000)); Stone v. Zimmer, Inc., No. 09-80252-CIV, 2009 WL 1809990, at *2 (S.D. Fla. 2009). In Count I, plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment because there is a dispute "as to whether or not Polo Staber has cooperated with plaintiff, and if he has not cooperated with plaintiff, whether said failure to cooperate violates the mediated settlement agreement." (Doc. #2, ¶ 11.) Nothing in the Amended Complaint would justify joinder of GEICO and Staber pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 20. In the ten months this case has been pending in federal court, plaintiff has made no apparent effort to serve Staber with process, despite knowing he was incarcerated.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. GEICO' Motion to Dismiss Count I of the Amended Complaint (Doc. #7) is GRANTED, and Count I is DISMISSED as to GEICO.

2. GEICO's Motion to Sever Count I of the Amended Complaint (Doc. #7) is GRANTED, and Count I as it relates to Polo R. Staber is REMANDED to the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Lee County, Florida.

3. The clerk of the court shall send a certified copy of this Opinion and Order to the Clerk Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Lee County, Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447.

DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida.


Summaries of

Kim v. Staber

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Aug 30, 2010
Case No. 2:09-cv-667-FtM-29DNF (M.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Kim v. Staber

Case Details

Full title:KEE K. KIM, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Gee B. Sunn…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division

Date published: Aug 30, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-667-FtM-29DNF (M.D. Fla. Aug. 30, 2010)