From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kim v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 8, 2021
No. 3077-20S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 8, 2021)

Opinion

3077-20S

06-08-2021

Jee Hyun Kim, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND DECISION

Diana L. Leyden Special Trial Judge

On May 11, 2021, respondent filed with the Court a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Properly Prosecute (motion to dismiss). This case was called from the calendar for the remote Trial Session of the Court for San Francisco, California, on June 7, 2021. There was no appearance by or on behalf of petitioner. Counsel for respondent appeared and was heard. After due consideration, and for cause more fully appearing in the transcript of the proceeding, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Properly Prosecute is granted, and this case is dismissed. It is further

ORDERED and DECIDED that there is a deficiency in income tax due from petitioner, as set forth in the notice of deficiency dated November 12, 2019, for the tax year 2017 in the amount of $10, 963.00, and that there is an accuracy-related penalty due from petitioner for the tax year 2017 under section 6662(a) in the amount of $2, 193.00.


Summaries of

Kim v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 8, 2021
No. 3077-20S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Kim v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Jee Hyun Kim, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 8, 2021

Citations

No. 3077-20S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 8, 2021)