Opinion
October, 1913.
Motion denied, without costs, with leave to renew if the appeal is not diligently prosecuted. Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P.J., not voting.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Kilsheimer, Jr. v. Kendal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1913
158 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Summaries of
Kilsheimer, Jr. v. Kendal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1913
158 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Case details for
Kilsheimer, Jr. v. Kendal
Case Details
Full title:James B. Kilsheimer, Jr., Respondent, v. Louis Kendal and Others…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Oct 1, 1913
Citations
158 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)