From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kilpatrick v. Houston

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Dec 10, 1999
197 F.3d 1134 (11th Cir. 1999)

Summary

reaching the opposite result

Summary of this case from Handley v. Chapman

Opinion

No. 99-10862.

DECIDED December 10, 1999

William Wagner, Dept. of Justice, Gainesville, FL, Pamela A. Moine, Stephen P. Preisser, Pensacola, FL, for Respondent-Appellant.

Robert Nissen, Arlington, VA, for Petitioner-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida (No. 98-00282-3-CV-RH); Robert Hinkle, Judge.

Before BLACK, Circuit Judge, and GODBOLD and FAY, Senior Circuit Judges.


The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in its Order Granting Writ of Habeas Corpus, which is published at 36 F. Supp.2d 1328 (N.D.Fla. 1999).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Kilpatrick v. Houston

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Dec 10, 1999
197 F.3d 1134 (11th Cir. 1999)

reaching the opposite result

Summary of this case from Handley v. Chapman
Case details for

Kilpatrick v. Houston

Case Details

Full title:Jerry J. KILPATRICK, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Samuel H. HOUSTON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Dec 10, 1999

Citations

197 F.3d 1134 (11th Cir. 1999)

Citing Cases

Young v. Booker

1999). The district court opinions in each of these cases cited holdings to the same effect by numerous…

Scott v. Gilmer

The amended rules invoked a second divide in the circuits courts, this time over the question of whether the…