From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Killinger v. Granite Bay Care, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 14, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-162-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 14, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-162-DBH No. 2:12-cv-356-DBH No. 1:13-cv-08-DBH

01-14-2013

LEAH KILLINGER, PLAINTIFF v. GRANITE BAY CARE, INC., DEFENDANT MALYUN ISMAN, PLAINTIFF v. GRANITE BAY CARE, INC., DEFENDANT MAINE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, for the use of Maylun Isman, PLAINTIFF v. GRANITE BAY CARE, INC., DEFENDANT


ORDER ON MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION

All three cases are CONSOLIDATED in their entirety, by consent with respect to discovery, and by consent for trial with respect to 2:12-cv-356 and 1:13-cv-08, and over the defendant's objection with respect to 2:12-cv-162.

If, after discovery and any summary judgment practice are completed, the defendant believes that there is prejudice in joint trials, it can raise the issue under Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(b).

SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Killinger v. Granite Bay Care, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 14, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-162-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Killinger v. Granite Bay Care, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LEAH KILLINGER, PLAINTIFF v. GRANITE BAY CARE, INC., DEFENDANT MALYUN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Jan 14, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-162-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 14, 2013)