From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kille v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 12, 2018
No. 75403 (Nev. App. Oct. 12, 2018)

Opinion

No. 75403

10-12-2018

DAVID AUGUST KILLE, SR., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

David August Kille, Sr., appeals from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed on December 13, 2017. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument. NRAP 34(f)(3).

Kille's petition challenged the validity of his judgment and sentence because it claimed the State breached the guilty plea agreement and it sought an order vacating the guilty plea agreement and the judgment of conviction. See NRS 34.720(1). Consequently, it was subject to the procedural bars set forth in NRS 34.726, NRS 34.800, and NRS 34.810. See State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court (Riker), 121 Nev. 225, 231, 112 P.3d 1070, 1074 (2005) ("Application of the statutory procedural default rules to post-conviction habeas petitions is mandatory.").

Kille's petition was untimely because it was filed more than 13 years after the remittitur on direct appeal was issued on March 30, 2004, and it was successive because he had previously filed two postconviction petitions for writs of habeas corpus and the first one was decided on the merits. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(2). Therefore, his petition was procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(3). Moreover, because the State specifically pleaded laches, Kille was required to overcome the rebuttable presumption of prejudice to the State. See NRS 34.800(2).

See Kille v. State, Docket No. 42254 (Order of Affirmance, March 5, 2004).

See Kille, Sr. v. State, Docket No. 62741 (Order of Affirmance, November 13, 2013); Kille v. State, Docket No. 45216 (Order of Affirmance, October 11, 2005).

Kille did not explicitly allege good cause in his petition. To the extent he claimed the legal basis for his claim was not reasonably available before the Nevada Supreme Court decided Williams v. State Department of Corrections, 133 Nev. ___, 402 P.3d 1260 (2017), he failed to show good cause because Williams concerned a challenge to the computation of time served and did not provide a legal basis for a challenge to the validity of the judgment or sentence. See generally Bejarano v. State, 122 Nev. 1066, 1072, 146 P.3d 265, 270 (2006) (recognizing good cause may be established where the legal basis for a claim was not reasonably available). To the extent he claimed the factual basis for his claim did not exist until ten years after his judgment of conviction was entered, he failed to show good cause because he did not raise this claim within a reasonable time after the alleged breach occurred. See Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 252, 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003) (explaining good cause may be demonstrated when the factual basis for a claim was not reasonably available to be raised in a timely petition and the good cause claim itself is not procedurally defaulted). And to the extent he claimed his petition was not subject to procedural bars because it "escapes" the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act's one-year time limit, he failed to show good cause because ADEPA is a federal statute and does not govern the application of state procedural default rules. See generally Brown v. McDaniel, 130 Nev. 565, 575, 331 P.3d 867, 874 (2014) (explaining that "[t]he state procedural bars to post-conviction habeas relief . . . exist to implement policies [that are] independent from those animating the federal doctrine of procedural default" (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted)).

The district court entered the judgment of conviction on September 19, 2003. --------

We conclude Kille failed to demonstrate good cause or a fundamental miscarriage of justice sufficient to excuse the procedural bars to his petition and the State's specific plea of laches. Therefore, the district court did not err in denying the petition, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver /s/_________, J.
Tao /s/_________, J.
Gibbons cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge

David August Kille, Sr.

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Kille v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 12, 2018
No. 75403 (Nev. App. Oct. 12, 2018)
Case details for

Kille v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID AUGUST KILLE, SR., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 12, 2018

Citations

No. 75403 (Nev. App. Oct. 12, 2018)

Citing Cases

Kille v. State

Kille v. State, Docket No. 42254 (Order of Affirmance, March 5, 2004). Kille v. State, Docket No. 75403-COA…