Opinion
July 13, 1998
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
"`Leave to renew should be denied unless the moving party offers a reasonable excuse as to why the additional facts were not submitted on the original application'" ( Mayer v. McBrunigan Constr. Corp., 123 A.D.2d 606, quoting Caffee v. Arnold, 104 A.D.2d 352). Here, the plaintiff failed to offer a reasonable excuse for her failure to submit evidence of the deed, a public record. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion to renew.
Under the circumstances of this case sanctions are not warranted.
Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.