From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kilgore v. Mandeville

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2011
No. 2:07-cv-02485-GEB-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:07-cv-02485-GEB-KJN

09-27-2011

Kilgore Plaintiff(s) v. Mandeville et al Defendants.


REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO INCUR

COSTS (APPOINTED COUNSEL) AND

REQUEST FOR PAYMENT

REQUEST OF PRO BONO FOR PRE-APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES

Complete this form and return it to the court (with two copies) for approval prior to incurring the cost for which reimbursement is requested.

I, Edward Mislch, attorney for plaintiff(s), declare as follows:

I was appointed to represent plaintiff(s) in this action on September 13, 2011, by the Honorable Magistrate Judge Newman , United States District Judge/Magistrate. I believe that the following course of action is reasonably necessary to the prosecution of this action:

$200.00 (approximately) to download documents from the PACER system. I have already incurred $142.00 for most of these documents to download 100 of the documents on file.
(e.g., deposition of ______, defendant herein).

I have made reasonable inquiry and believe that the cost of this course of action will not exceed the amount of $200.00 .

I therefore request that this court authorize the expenditure in an amount not to exceed that stated above for the completion of this contemplated course of action.

The following payments of costs have been heretofore approved in this matter:

+------------------------+ ¦Amount ¦ ¦Amount¦ ¦ ¦Purpose¦ ¦ ¦Approved ¦ ¦Paid ¦ +---------+-------+------¦ +---------+-------+------¦ +---------+-------+------¦ +---------+-------+------¦ +---------+-------+------¦ +---------+-------+------¦ +------------------------+

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Signed this 23 day of September 2011, at Sacramento, California.

Edward Misleh, CA State Bar # 273645

615 Tenth Street, Sacramento, CA 95814

Attorney for Plaintiff(s)

The above expenditure is X Approved ______ Denied

Or,

______ Good cause appearing therefore, this matter is set for discovery conference, pursuant to rule ______ , on ______, at ______,______.M. in Courtroom

Number_.______

___________

United States District Judge/Magistrate


Summaries of

Kilgore v. Mandeville

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 27, 2011
No. 2:07-cv-02485-GEB-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Kilgore v. Mandeville

Case Details

Full title:Kilgore Plaintiff(s) v. Mandeville et al Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 27, 2011

Citations

No. 2:07-cv-02485-GEB-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)