From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kilgore v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 22, 2000
273 A.D.2d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: June 22, 2000.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Greene Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Benjamin Kilgore, Coxsackie, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of physical interference with an employee, refusing a direct order and harassment. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the correction officer's misbehavior report was sufficiently detailed and probative to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Almonor v. Selsky, 241 A.D.2d 584, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 810). Petitioner's contention that the correction officer misrepresented the incident in his report raised a credibility issue properly resolved by the Hearing Officer (see, Matter of Malik v. Senkowski, 271 A.D.2d 793, 706 N.Y.S.2d 648).

By failing to object at the hearing, petitioner's claims that he was denied both witnesses and documentary evidence have neither been preserved for our review (see, Matter of Serrano v. Goord, 266 A.D.2d 661, lv denied 94 N.Y.2d 762 [Mar. 30, 2000]), nor do they have merit. Petitioner's witnesses either testified, did not witness the incident or simply refused to testify and the Hearing Officer fully explored petitioner's documentary evidence claims and properly found that the requested material was either irrelevant or unavailable (see, Matter of Weatherly v. Goord, 268 A.D.2d 641, 701 N.Y.S.2d 675). Finally, we have examined petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer was biased and find it to be wholly unsupported by the record.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Kilgore v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 22, 2000
273 A.D.2d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Kilgore v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BENJAMIN KILGORE, Petitioner, v. GLENN GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 22, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 366

Citing Cases

Smith v. Dubray

Although Directive No. 4937 was not, at the time of petitioner's hearing, filed as required with the…

Pineda v. Goord

The transcript of the disciplinary hearing discloses that petitioner did not raise any objections concerning…