From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kielly v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 7, 2019
177 A.D.3d 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

527509

11-07-2019

In the Matter of Sara G. KIELLY, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, Respondent.

Sara G. Kielly, Marcy, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Sara G. Kielly, Marcy, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Devine and Aarons, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Five Points Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II disciplinary determination finding her guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. To the extent that petitioner seeks to be restored to the housing status that she enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination, she is not entitled to such relief (see Matter of Mercado v. Annucci, 172 A.D.3d 1844, 1845, 99 N.Y.S.3d 725 [2019] ). Given that petitioner has received all the relief to which she is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Bailey v. Annucci, 173 A.D.3d 1600, 1600, 101 N.Y.S.3d 657 [2019] ; Matter of Mercer v. Annucci, 173 A.D.3d 1595, 1596, 101 N.Y.S.3d 661 [2019] ). As the record reflects that petitioner was ordered to pay a reduced filing fee of $15 and she has requested reimbursement thereof, we grant petitioner's request for that amount (see Matter of Silva v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 172 A.D.3d 1862, 1863, 99 N.Y.S.3d 724 [2019] ; Matter of Ford v. Annucci, 172 A.D.3d 1815, 1816, 98 N.Y.S.3d 924 [2019] ).

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.


Summaries of

Kielly v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 7, 2019
177 A.D.3d 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Kielly v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Sara G. Kielly, Petitioner, v. New York State Department…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 7, 2019

Citations

177 A.D.3d 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
109 N.Y.S.3d 915
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 7969

Citing Cases

Kennedy v. Annucci

Inasmuch as petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be…

Battease v. N.Y. State Dep't of Corr. & Cmty. Supervision

Given that petitioner otherwise has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be…