From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kieffer v. Byrd

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Jun 29, 2001
50 S.W.3d 307 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 78000

June 29, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY HON. ROBERT S. COHEN.

Carolynne Kieffer, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Richard Gregory Byrd, Clayton, MO, for Respondent.

Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Paul J. Simon, J., and Sherri B. Sullivan, J.



ORDER


Carolynne M. Kieffer (Appellant) appeals the trial court's grant of Richard G. Byrd's (Respondent) First Amended Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there are no genuine issues of material fact and Respondent is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 377 (Mo.banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is denied. Appellant's Motion to Strike Exhibits is granted. Appellant's Motion to File Supplemental Record on Appeal is granted.


Summaries of

Kieffer v. Byrd

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Jun 29, 2001
50 S.W.3d 307 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Kieffer v. Byrd

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYNNE M. KIEFFER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. RICHARD G. BYRD…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Jun 29, 2001

Citations

50 S.W.3d 307 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)