From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kieferle v. Kingsland

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Dec 5, 1949
178 F.2d 728 (D.C. Cir. 1949)

Opinion

No. 9979.

Argued October 14, 1949.

Decided December 5, 1949.

Mr. Frank E. Scrivener, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Charles K. Davies, Jr., Bethesda, Md. was on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. E.L. Reynolds, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Mr. W.W. Cochran, former Solicitor, United States Patent Office, Washington. D.C., was also on the brief for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judges.


Appellants sued under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to obtain a patent on a system of writing music in which notes are given different colors according to volume of sound. We agree with the District Court and the Patent Office that this system is not patentable for lack of invention over the prior art and also because printed matter is not patentable.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kieferle v. Kingsland

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Dec 5, 1949
178 F.2d 728 (D.C. Cir. 1949)
Case details for

Kieferle v. Kingsland

Case Details

Full title:KIEFERLE et al. v. KINGSLAND, Commissioner of Patents

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Dec 5, 1949

Citations

178 F.2d 728 (D.C. Cir. 1949)