From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kiefer v. Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 1897
14 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

Opinion

February Term, 1897.


Motion denied, without costs and without prejudice. See Per Curiam mem. in the case of Medora A Harroun and Another, as Administrators, etc., Respondents, v. The Brush Electric Light Company, Appellant, decided at this term ( ante, p. 19). All concurred.


Summaries of

Kiefer v. Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 1897
14 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
Case details for

Kiefer v. Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada

Case Details

Full title:Mary Kiefer, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Grand Trunk Railway…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1897

Citations

14 App. Div. 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)