From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kiedrowski v. Prosper

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 15, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0324 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0324 KJM P.

July 15, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. By order filed May 7, 2010, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Kiedrowski v. Prosper

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 15, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0324 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2010)
Case details for

Kiedrowski v. Prosper

Case Details

Full title:JOHN KIEDROWSKI, Plaintiff, v. K. PROSPER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 15, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0324 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2010)