From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kidwell v. Shinseki

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Feb 16, 2012
2011-7207 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 16, 2012)

Opinion

2011-7207

02-16-2012

BILLY R. KIDWELL, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.


Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 11-0236, Judge Lawrence B. Hagel.

ON MOTION


ORDER

Billy R. Kidwell files various motions, including motions for judicial notice, hearing, and sanctions.

To the extent Kidwell is attempting to make arguments concerning his case, such arguments should be in the briefs, and the motions are denied on that ground. In his November 18, 2011 "motion for judicial notice," it appears that Kidwell seeks to amend his briefs and that document is treated as a supplement to his briefs.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motions and notices are denied. The November 18, 2011 "motion for judicial notice" is treated as a supplement to his briefs. Copies of this order and that supplement shall be transmitted to the merits panel with the briefs.

FOR THE COURT

_________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
cc: Billy R. Kidwell

Courtney S. McNamara, Esq.
s8


Summaries of

Kidwell v. Shinseki

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Feb 16, 2012
2011-7207 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Kidwell v. Shinseki

Case Details

Full title:BILLY R. KIDWELL, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 16, 2012

Citations

2011-7207 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 16, 2012)