From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kidwell v. Collins

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 10, 2022
2:22-cv-0738 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-0738 AC P

06-10-2022

SEQUOYAH DESERTHAWK KIDWELL, Plaintiff, v. JASON COLLINS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By order filed May 3, 2022, the court found that the conduct alleged to have violated plaintiff's rights occurred almost exclusively in Kings County and that any potentially cognizable claims were likely to lie against defendants located within Kings County, which is part of the Fresno Division of this court. ECF No. 4. The parties were therefore ordered to show cause why this case should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno. Id. Defendants have filed a notice consenting to the transfer, ECF No. 5, and plaintiff has not responded. Because defendants have consented to the transfer and plaintiff has not shown cause why this case should not be transferred, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of this court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court

Eastern District of California

2500 Tulare Street

Fresno, CA 93721


Summaries of

Kidwell v. Collins

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 10, 2022
2:22-cv-0738 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Kidwell v. Collins

Case Details

Full title:SEQUOYAH DESERTHAWK KIDWELL, Plaintiff, v. JASON COLLINS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 10, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-0738 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2022)