Finding that none of the requirements of the borrowed-servant rule were satisfied and evidence showed that only the general master could remove the employee from his assigned task
Kidd v. Dentsply Intl. Moreover, Kidd v. Dentsply Intl., 278 Ga. App. 346, 348 (1) ( 629 SE2d 58) (2006). [t]here is a distinction between the act of merely following directions while giving assistance to another's servant and the status of being within the "complete control" of another's servant.
