From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kidd v. Broomfield

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 13, 2022
20-cv-08694-JCS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)

Opinion

20-cv-08694-JCS (PR)

06-13-2022

MARK DEWAINE KIDD, Plaintiff, v. RON BROOMFIELD, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

JOSEPH C. SPERO, CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff was ordered to file an amended complaint after his original complaint was dismissed in response to defendant's motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 18.) The deadline has passed and no amended complaint has been filed. Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failure to comply with the Court's order and for failure to prosecute, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen. Any motion to reopen must (i) have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page; and (ii) contain an amended complaint that appears on this Court's form and that complies with all the instructions in the order dismissing the complaint with leave to amend.

The parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction for all purposes under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (Dkt. Nos. 6 and 12.)

The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kidd v. Broomfield

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 13, 2022
20-cv-08694-JCS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Kidd v. Broomfield

Case Details

Full title:MARK DEWAINE KIDD, Plaintiff, v. RON BROOMFIELD, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 13, 2022

Citations

20-cv-08694-JCS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2022)