From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kibiuk v. Windsor Residences

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 20, 1945
184 Misc. 186 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)

Opinion

February 20, 1945.

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, New York County, CARLIN, J.

Alfred S. Julien and Theodore Kamens for plaintiff-appellant and respondent.

Mordecai Goldberg and Irving Segal for defendant-appellant.

William E. Lyons for defendant-respondent.


MEMORANDUM


Plaintiff's proofs do not fully sustain her alleged cause of action.

On appeal by defendant Windsor Residences, Inc., the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to said appellant to abide the event.

Appeal from the order should be dismissed.

On plaintiff's appeal the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

See, also, Rufo v. South Brooklyn Sav. Bank, 268 A.D. 105 7, and cf. McCabe v. Cohen, 268 A.D. 1064. — [REP.

HAMMER, McLAUGHLIN and EDER, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Kibiuk v. Windsor Residences

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 20, 1945
184 Misc. 186 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)
Case details for

Kibiuk v. Windsor Residences

Case Details

Full title:JULIA KIBIUK, Appellant-Respondent, v. WINDSOR RESIDENCES, INC.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 20, 1945

Citations

184 Misc. 186 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)
54 N.Y.S.2d 117