From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khudan v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 12, 2016
139 A.D.3d 1198 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

520709

05-12-2016

In the Matter of RAMESH KHUDAN, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Heidell, Pittoni, Murphy & Bach, LLP, New York City (Maura S. Kernan of counsel), for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.


Before: Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose, Devine and Mulvey, JJ.

Heidell, Pittoni, Murphy & Bach, LLP, New York City (Maura S. Kernan of counsel), for petitioner.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Although petitioner seeks to be restored to the status that he maintained prior to the disciplinary determination, he is not entitled to that relief (see Matter of Corrieri v Annucci, 137 AD3d 1407, 1408 [2016]; Matter of Daum v Venettozzi, 136 AD3d 1096, 1097 [2016]). As petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of James v Prack, 137 AD3d 1390, 1391 [2016]; Matter of Gunn v Annucci, 133 AD3d 989, 990 [2015]).

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose, Devine and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Khudan v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 12, 2016
139 A.D.3d 1198 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Khudan v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAMESH KHUDAN, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 12, 2016

Citations

139 A.D.3d 1198 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3774
29 N.Y.S.3d 827

Citing Cases

Ramirez v. Annucci

In view of this, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Robinson v Prack, 137 AD3d 1452, 1452…

Mitchell v. Dep't of Corr. & Cmty. Supervision

We note that petitioner is not entitled to be restored to the status that he enjoyed prior to the…