From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khoury v. Khoury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 2001
280 A.D.2d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued January 2, 2001.

February 5, 2001.

In an action to recover on a promissory note brought by motion pursuant to CPLR 3213 for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), entered January 13, 2000, as denied those branches of his motion which were to vacate so much of a prior order of the same court entered September 3, 1999, as imposed a sanction on him and to compel disclosure.

Saman F. Khoury, Oak Ridge, N.J., appellant pro se.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, HOWARD MILLER, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to vacate the imposition of a sanction is dismissed as academic without costs or disbursements, in light of our determination in Khoury v. Khoury (___ A.D.2d ___ [Appellate Division Docket No. 1999-09490, decided herewith]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contentions, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of his motion which was to compel disclosure, on the ground, inter alia, that the material sought was irrelevant to the litigation (see, CPLR 3042[d]; 3123; Martin v. We're Assocs., 127 A.D.2d 568, 569).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Khoury v. Khoury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 2001
280 A.D.2d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Khoury v. Khoury

Case Details

Full title:SAMAN F. KHOURY, ETC., APPELLANT, v. DAOUD KHOURY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 5, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 454 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
720 N.Y.S.2d 367

Citing Cases

Martell v. K&K Auto & Towing Corp.

. The plaintiffs' Fifth Notice to Admit is patently improper inasmuch it does not seek the admission of…