From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khoshnaw v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Nov 1, 2013
CASE NO. C13-846 MJP (W.D. Wash. Nov. 1, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. C13-846 MJP

11-01-2013

SAMAN MOHAMMED KHOSHNAW, Petitioner, v. US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION IN LIGHT OF

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS AND

DISMISSING CASE AS MOOT

This matter is before the Court on Respondent's Objections to the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") issued by the Honorable Magistrate Judge Donohue. (Dkt. No. 16.) The Objections contend that events occurring after the filing of the R&R warrant the Court's departure from the R&R and dismissal of Petitioner's case as moot. The Court agrees and dismisses Petitioner's case as moot.

Petitioner brought his action for relief under the writ of habeas corpus challenging the lawfulness of his immigration detention under 8 U.S.C. §1226(c). (Dkt. No. 1 at 1.) The relief sought by Petitioner was that Respondents be "temporarily restrained from detaining" him during the pendency of his immigration proceedings and that they be "permanently enjoined" from holding him without bond. (Dkt. No. 1 at 8.) The R&R, issued on September 9, 2013, recommended granting the petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Dkt. No. 15 at 1.) At the time the R&R was filed, Petitioner remained detained without bond. (Id. at 5.) On September 17, 2013, an immigration judge set bond at $10,000 for Petitioner. (Dkt. No. 16-1 at 2.) Petitioner did not post bond, and remained detained until his merits hearing before an immigration judge on September 25, 2013. At the merits hearing Petitioner was granted deferral of removal under Article III of the Convention Against Torture. (Dkt. No. 16-2 at 2.) Petitioner was released from custody on an order of supervision on September 26, 2013. (Dkt. No. 16-3 at 2.)

A petition for habeas relief becomes moot when the petitioner no longer has a personal stake in the outcome of the suit. Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1,7 (1998). A habeas petition fails to present a live controversy after the petitioner is released from custody unless "collateral consequences" remain which may be redressed by the success of the petition. Id. at 7. Courts in the Ninth Circuit have found where a petitioner is released from detention and granted deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture, his habeas case becomes moot. Rahim Azizarab v. Lee, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152754, *7 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 16 2011). Further, where a habeas petitioner only challenges his detention without bond, his release on an order of supervision moots his challenge. See, Abdala v. INS, 488 F.3d 1061, 1064 (9th Cir. 2007).

Petitioner's detention does not have collateral consequences that can be resolved by the success of his original petition. Because Petitioner is released from custody under an order of supervision and because he was granted deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture, his habeas petition is DISMISSED as MOOT.

The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.

______________________

Marsha J. Pechman

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Khoshnaw v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Nov 1, 2013
CASE NO. C13-846 MJP (W.D. Wash. Nov. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Khoshnaw v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Case Details

Full title:SAMAN MOHAMMED KHOSHNAW, Petitioner, v. US DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Date published: Nov 1, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. C13-846 MJP (W.D. Wash. Nov. 1, 2013)