From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khimich v. Emp't Dep't & Or. Health Scis. Univ.

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Dec 20, 2023
329 Or. App. 715 (Or. Ct. App. 2023)

Opinion

A178961

12-20-2023

NATALYA V. KHIMICH, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and Oregon Health Sciences University, Respondents.

Ray D. Hacke argued the cause for petitioner. Also on the briefs was Pacifc Justice Institute. Emily N. Snook, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Employment Department. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General. Misha Isaak argued the cause for respondent Oregon Health & Science University. Also on the brief were Whitney Brown and Stoel Rives LLP.


This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

Argued and submitted November 6, 2023.

Employment Appeals Board 2022EAB0402

Ray D. Hacke argued the cause for petitioner. Also on the briefs was Pacifc Justice Institute.

Emily N. Snook, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Employment Department. Also on the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.

Misha Isaak argued the cause for respondent Oregon Health & Science University. Also on the brief were Whitney Brown and Stoel Rives LLP.

Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. Lavelle-Hayden v. Employment Dept., 326 Or.App. 490, 533 P.3d 75 (2023).


Summaries of

Khimich v. Emp't Dep't & Or. Health Scis. Univ.

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Dec 20, 2023
329 Or. App. 715 (Or. Ct. App. 2023)
Case details for

Khimich v. Emp't Dep't & Or. Health Scis. Univ.

Case Details

Full title:NATALYA V. KHIMICH, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and Oregon Health…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon

Date published: Dec 20, 2023

Citations

329 Or. App. 715 (Or. Ct. App. 2023)