From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khazzan v. Lackner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2016
Case No. CV 14-2675-FMO (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-2675-FMO (SP)

01-04-2016

JULIAN SOHAIL KHAZZAN, Petitioner, v. HEIDI M. LACKNER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment will be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: January 4, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Khazzan v. Lackner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2016
Case No. CV 14-2675-FMO (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2016)
Case details for

Khazzan v. Lackner

Case Details

Full title:JULIAN SOHAIL KHAZZAN, Petitioner, v. HEIDI M. LACKNER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 4, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 14-2675-FMO (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2016)