From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khazali v. Washington

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 11, 2023
No. C23-0796JLR (W.D. Wash. Jul. 11, 2023)

Opinion

C23-0796JLR

07-11-2023

MASOUD KHAZALI, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, Defendant.


ORDER

JAMES L. ROBART UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the court on a limited referral from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (See Not. (Dkt. # 10).) The Ninth Circuit asks the court to determine whether Plaintiff Masoud Khazali's in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status should continue on appeal or whether, instead, it should be revoked because his appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. (Id.) Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal may not be taken IFP if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith or is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Hooker v. Am. Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002).

The court finds that Mr. Khazali's appeal is frivolous and therefore REVOKES his IFP status on appeal. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to forward a copy of this order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and to Mr. Khazali.


Summaries of

Khazali v. Washington

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jul 11, 2023
No. C23-0796JLR (W.D. Wash. Jul. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Khazali v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:MASOUD KHAZALI, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jul 11, 2023

Citations

No. C23-0796JLR (W.D. Wash. Jul. 11, 2023)