From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KHAN v. U.S.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division
Mar 8, 2010
2:09CV00077 BSM-JTR (E.D. Ark. Mar. 8, 2010)

Opinion

2:09CV00077 BSM-JTR.

March 8, 2010


ORDER


The court has received the partial recommended disposition submitted by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. The parties have not filed any objections. After reviewing the partial recommended disposition and reviewing the record de novo, it is concluded that the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety in all respects.

Accordingly, defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 9) and supplemental motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 14) are GRANTED as to plaintiff's assault claim and DENIED as to plaintiff's negligence claim. Plaintiff's assault claim is therefore DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE. In addition, it is CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

KHAN v. U.S.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division
Mar 8, 2010
2:09CV00077 BSM-JTR (E.D. Ark. Mar. 8, 2010)
Case details for

KHAN v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:AFTAB AHMED KHAN Reg. #09260-062 a/k/a Aftab Khan Ahmed PLAINTIFF v…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 8, 2010

Citations

2:09CV00077 BSM-JTR (E.D. Ark. Mar. 8, 2010)