From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 25, 2021
313 So. 3d 941 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-3175

03-25-2021

Saeed Akhtar KHAN, M.D., Petitioner, v. State of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Respondent.

Robert N. Nicholson and Parker D. Eastin of Nicholson & Eastin, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Petitioner. Sarah Young Hodges, Chief Appellate Counsel, Department of Health, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Robert N. Nicholson and Parker D. Eastin of Nicholson & Eastin, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Petitioner.

Sarah Young Hodges, Chief Appellate Counsel, Department of Health, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

B.L. Thomas, Bilbrey, and Nordby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Khan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 25, 2021
313 So. 3d 941 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Khan v. State

Case Details

Full title:Saeed Akhtar KHAN, M.D., Petitioner, v. State of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Mar 25, 2021

Citations

313 So. 3d 941 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)