From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khan v. Payton

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 5, 2024
20-cv-03086-BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2024)

Opinion

20-cv-03086-BLF (PR)

08-05-2024

MUHAMMAD KHAN, Plaintiff, v. M. PAYTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO RESPOND REGARDING REFERRAL TO SETTLEMENT PROCEEDINGS

BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against employees of San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”). On November 15, 2023, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 72. As of the last court order, discovery remains pending. Dkt. No. 91.

The Court has established a Pro Se Prisoner Settlement Program under which certain prisoner civil rights cases may be referred to a neutral Magistrate Judge for settlement. This matter has been pending for over four years and discovery matters are still pending. Accordingly, the Court requests the parties to file notice whether they agree or disagree to a referral to settlement proceedings to attempt to resolve this matter.

If the parties agree to the referral, the Court will terminate without prejudice the pending summary judgment motion. In the event settlement proceedings are unsuccessful, the Court will deem Defendants' summary judgment refiled after receiving notice from the parties and reschedule briefing on the matter.

All parties shall file their response to this order by checking ONE of the two boxes below, indicating their agreement or disagreement to a referral to settlement proceedings. The response shall be completed and returned to the Court no later than August 21, 2024.

Until the parties agree to settlement proceedings, the current filing date for Plaintiff's opposition, i.e., September 23, 2024, and Defendants' reply deadline of fourteen days thereafter shall remain.

The Clerk shall include 2 copies of this order to Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Indicate your response to a referral to settlement proceedings below and return to the Court by August 21, 2024 :

[ ] I agree to a referral of this matter to settlement proceedings.

[ ] I disagree to a referral of this matter to settlement proceedings.

Date: ______

Name:______

Signature________


Summaries of

Khan v. Payton

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 5, 2024
20-cv-03086-BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Khan v. Payton

Case Details

Full title:MUHAMMAD KHAN, Plaintiff, v. M. PAYTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 5, 2024

Citations

20-cv-03086-BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2024)