From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khan v. Payton

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 22, 2022
20-cv-03086 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2022)

Opinion

20-cv-03086 BLF (PR)

08-22-2022

MUHAMMAD KHAN, Plaintiff, v. M. PAYTON, Defendant.


ORDER ADDRESSING REQUEST FOR RESOURCES; INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against an officer at San Quentin State Prison. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff has filed a second amended complaint which will be screened in due course. Skt. No. 38.

Plaintiff has recently filed an ex-parte request for a copy of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Civil Local Rules. Dkt. No. 47. The Court notes that Plaintiff is currently housed at the Santa Clara County Jail and has attempted to get “Pro Per Status.” Dkt. No. 29. Pro Per status should enable Plaintiff to access certain legal resources at the Jail. Accordingly, Plaintiff's request is DENIED to seeking the legal material from the Jail after establishing Pro Per status, if he has not already done so.

To assist Plaintiff, the Clerk shall send Plaintiff a copy of the docket of this action, so that Plaintiff can provide proof that he is litigating this matter in pro se to the Jail.

This order terminates Docket No. 47.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Khan v. Payton

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 22, 2022
20-cv-03086 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Khan v. Payton

Case Details

Full title:MUHAMMAD KHAN, Plaintiff, v. M. PAYTON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 22, 2022

Citations

20-cv-03086 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2022)