From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Khalil v. Fernandez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 14, 2016
145 A.D.3d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

12-14-2016

Hany KHALIL, appellant, v. Manuel FERNANDEZ, respondent.

Harmon, Linder & Rogowsky (Mitchell Dranow, Sea Cliff, NY, of counsel), for appellant. Richard T. Lau, Jericho, NY (Nancy S. Goodman of counsel), for respondent.


Harmon, Linder & Rogowsky (Mitchell Dranow, Sea Cliff, NY, of counsel), for appellant.

Richard T. Lau, Jericho, NY (Nancy S. Goodman of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), entered December 9, 2014, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell on “dark gray” ice on the sidewalk abutting premises owned by the defendant. According to the plaintiff, he observed the ice prior to his fall, but he did not realize that it was ice until he stepped on it because the ice was the same color as the sidewalk cement. The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly resulting from the fall.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendant established, prima facie, that he did not create the alleged icy condition or have actual or constructive notice of it (see Cuillo v. Fairfield Prop. Servs., L.P., 112 A.D.3d 777, 778, 977 N.Y.S.2d 353 ; Gershfeld v. Marine Park Funeral Home, Inc., 62 A.D.3d 833, 834, 879 N.Y.S.2d 549 ; Fung v. Japan Airlines Co., Ltd., 51 A.D.3d 861, 862, 858 N.Y.S.2d 738 ; Ronconi v. Denzel Assoc., 20 A.D.3d 559, 560, 799 N.Y.S.2d 271 ; Murphy v. 136 N. Blvd. Assoc., 304 A.D.2d 540, 757 N.Y.S.2d 582 ). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, MALTESE and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Khalil v. Fernandez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 14, 2016
145 A.D.3d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Khalil v. Fernandez

Case Details

Full title:Hany KHALIL, appellant, v. Manuel FERNANDEZ, respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 14, 2016

Citations

145 A.D.3d 765 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
41 N.Y.S.3d 915
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8351

Citing Cases

Vozzo v. Fairfield Westlake Square, LLC

The defendant appeals."A property owner will be held liable for a slip-and-fall accident involving snow and…

Hartung v. Diocese of Rockville Ctr.

The Supreme Court granted the motion, and the plaintiff appeals. The defendant established its prima facie…