In any case, “[a] generalized statement that travel is inconsistent with a claimant's alleged limitations is insufficient without indication of what other activities the claimant undertook or how much . . . w[as] required during their travel.” K.G. v. Kijakazi, No. 21-CV-02953-NC, 2022 WL 2207102, at *5 (N.D. Cal. June 21, 2022). Finally, the ALJ relied on Plaintiff's ability to “care for a foster child.

See K.G. v. Kijakazi, No. 21-CV-02953-NC, 2022 WL 2207102, at *5 (N.D. Cal. June 21, 2022) (“A generalized statement that travel is inconsistent with a claimant's alleged limitations is insufficient without indication of what activities the claimant undertook or how much . . . w[as] required during their travel.”)