From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KFD Enters. Inc. v. City of Eureka

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 20, 2011
No. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

No. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC

10-20-2011

KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California corporation dba Norman's Dry Cleaner, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF EUREKA, et al., Defendants.

Respectfully submitted, Eric Grant John B. Thomas Jay N. Gross Hicks Thomas LLP Counsel for Defendant R.R. STREET & CO. INC. (The filer hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.) GREBEN & ASSOCIATES Jan A. Greben Jeff Coyner Danielle De Smeth Attorneys for Plaintiff KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California corporation dba Norman's Dry Cleaner


Eric Grant (Bar No. 151064)

Hicks Thomas LLP

John B. Thomas (Bar No. 269538)

Jay N. Gross (pro hac vice)

Hicks Thomas LLP

Counsel for Defendant

R.R. STREET & CO. INC.

AND ALL RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS

AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS.

ORDER GRANTING

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE OF PLAINTIFF KFD

ENTERPRISES, INC.'S ENTIRE

ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT

R.R. STREET & CO. INC.

[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2); Civil L.R. 7-12]

Courtroom: 7 (19th Floor)

Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and Civil L.R. 7-12, Plaintiff KFD Enterprises, Inc. ("KFD") and Defendant R.R. Street & Co. Inc. ("Street") hereby stipulate and respectfully request judicial action as follows:

WHEREAS, KFD has asserted and prosecuted this action against Street, among other parties;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), KFD now desires to dismiss with prejudice its entire action, and all claims encompassed therein, against Street, while continuing its action against all other parties, cf. Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. United States Forest Service, 403 F.3d 683, 687 (9th Cir. 2005) (observing that Rule 41(a) "allow[s] the dismissal of all claims against one defendant, so that a defendant may be dismissed from the entire action"); and

WHEREAS, KFD and Street agree that each party will bear its own costs and attorneys' fees with respect to KFD's action against Street;

THEREFORE, the parties hereto stipulate and respectfully request that this Court enter an order dismissing with prejudice KFD's entire action, and all claims encompassed therein, against Street only, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

Respectfully submitted,

Eric Grant

John B. Thomas

Jay N. Gross

Hicks Thomas LLP

Counsel for Defendant

R.R. STREET & CO. INC.

(The filer hereby attests that concurrence in

the filing of this document has been obtained

from the signatory below.)

GREBEN & ASSOCIATES

Jan A. Greben

Jeff Coyner

Danielle De Smeth

Attorneys for Plaintiff KFD ENTERPRISES,

INC., a California corporation dba Norman's

Dry Cleaner

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

KFD Enters. Inc. v. City of Eureka

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 20, 2011
No. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

KFD Enters. Inc. v. City of Eureka

Case Details

Full title:KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California corporation dba Norman's Dry Cleaner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

No. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2011)