From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KFD Enters. Inc. v. City of Eureka

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 26, 2011
No. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC

10-26-2011

KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California corporation dba Norman's Dry Cleaner, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF EUREKA, et al., Defendants. AND ALL RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS.

Eric Grant John B. Thomas Jay N. Gross Hicks Thomas LLP Counsel for Defendant R.R. STREET & CO. INC. DAVIDOVITZ & BENNETT LLP CHARLES BOLCOM MORIS DAVIDOVITZ CHARLES BOLCOM Attorneys for Defendant, Cross-Claimant and Counter-Claimant CITY OF EUREKA


Eric Grant (Bar No. 151064)

grant@hicks-thomas.com

Hicks Thomas LLP

8001 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 100

Sacramento, California 95826

Telephone: (916) 388-0833

Facsimile: (916) 691-3261

John B. Thomas (Bar No. 269538)

jthomas@hicks-thomas.com

Jay N. Gross (pro hac vice)

jgross@hicks-thomas.com

Hicks Thomas LLP

700 Louisiana Street, Suite 2000

Houston, Texas 77002

Telephone: (713) 547-9100

Facsimile: (713) 547-9150

Counsel for Defendant

R.R. STREET & CO. INC.

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT CITY

OF EUREKA'S ENTIRE CROSS

CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT

R.R. STREET & CO. INC.

[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), (c); Civil L.R. 7-12]

Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) and (c) and Civil L.R. 7-12, Defendant City of Eureka (the "City") and Defendant R.R. Street & Co. Inc. ("Street") hereby stipulate and respectfully request judicial action as follows:

WHEREAS, the City has asserted and prosecuted within this action a cross-claim against Street, among other parties;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2)—as made applicable by Rule 41(c)—the City now desires to dismiss with prejudice its entire cross-claim, and all claims encompassed therein, against Street, while continuing its various claims against other parties, cf. Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. United States Forest Service, 403 F.3d 683, 687 (9th Cir. 2005) (observing that Rule 41(a) "allow[s] the dismissal of all claims against one defendant, so that a defendant may be dismissed from the entire action"); and

WHEREAS, the City and Street agree that each party will bear its own costs and attorneys' fees with respect to the City's cross-claim against Street;

THEREFORE, the parties hereto stipulate and respectfully request that this Court enter an order dismissing with prejudice the City's entire cross-claim, and all claims encompassed therein, against Street only, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

Respectfully submitted,

Eric Grant

John B. Thomas

Jay N. Gross

Hicks Thomas LLP

Counsel for Defendant

R.R. STREET & CO. INC.

(The filer hereby attests that concurrence in

the filing of this document has been obtained

from the signatory below.)

DAVIDOVITZ & BENNETT LLP

By: CHARLES BOLCOM

MORIS DAVIDOVITZ

CHARLES BOLCOM

Attorneys for Defendant, Cross-Claimant and

Counter-Claimant CITY OF EUREKA

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

KFD Enters. Inc. v. City of Eureka

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 26, 2011
No. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)
Case details for

KFD Enters. Inc. v. City of Eureka

Case Details

Full title:KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California corporation dba Norman's Dry Cleaner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

Citations

No. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)