Keyser v. State

4 Citing cases

  1. Johnson v. State

    685 S.E.2d 339 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 1 times

    We have previously found that if a suspect complies with an officer's request to step outside the home and is arrested on the porch, the detention does not occur inside the home for purposes of Fourth Amendment analysis. See Keyser v. State, 187 Ga. App. 95 (1) ( 369 SE2d 309) (1988) ("appellant's arrest . . . occurred on the front porch of his house, after he had complied with the request of a police officer to step outside. An arrest of appellant under such circumstances would not constitute an arrest which was made inside his home").

  2. Ehrlich v. State

    375 S.E.2d 272 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)   Cited 4 times

    When delivery of the package was accepted, the officer had probable cause to believe that, in his presence, appellant was committing the crime of possession of cocaine. See Keyser v. State, 187 Ga. App. 95 (1) ( 369 S.E.2d 309) (1988). After his arrest, appellant requested and was allowed to obtain some articles of clothing to take with him. While doing so, appellant was accompanied by the officer and, during this lawful intrusion into the residence, the officer observed, in plain sight on a counter top, white residue which he reasonably believed to be cocaine.

  3. State v. Solberg

    122 Wn. 2d 688 (Wash. 1993)   Cited 53 times
    In State v. Solberg, 122 Wn.2d 688, 861 P.2d 460 (1993), this Court also distinguished arrests made inside a residence from arrests made in public under the State Constitution.

    State v. Santiago, 224 Conn. 494, 619 A.2d 1132 (1993); Koehler v. State, 444 So.2d 1032 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 1984); Keyser v. State, 187 Ga. App. 95, 369 S.E.2d 309, cert. denied, 187 Ga. App. 908 (1988); People v. Lekas, 155 Ill. App.3d 391, 508 N.E.2d 221, appeal denied, 116 Ill.2d 569 (1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 942 (1988); People v. Arias, 179 Ill. App.3d 890, 535 N.E.2d 89, appeal denied, 126 Ill.2d 561 (1989); People v. Jones, 119 Ill. App.3d 615, 456 N.E.2d 926 (1983); People v. Herner, 156 Misc.2d 735, 594 N.Y.S.2d 544 (Sup.Ct. 1993). Our research discloses just one case which affords the same degree of privacy to an unenclosed front porch as to a home and concluded that an arrest on a porch violates Payton.

  4. Puckett v. State

    521 S.E.2d 634 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 7 times

    (Punctuation omitted; emphasis in original.) Keyser v. State, 187 S.E.2d 95-96 ( 369 S.E.2d 309) (1988). See also Collins v. State, 191 Ga. App. 289, 292(7) ( 381 S.E.2d 430) (1989); Malpass v. State, 173 Ga. App. 690, 691 ( 327 S.E.2d 753) (1985).